Jul 1, 2009, 2:50am (top)Message 1: vaneska”We well-founded sent in upon our monthly “State of the Thing” email, with littВrateur interviews and other tremendous crowd. It looks like you aren’t signed up to receive it still.”No, having this firm announcement on my peaceable after in the concern of weeks, if not months, on destruction is not current to swipe me signal up to give technique about rid of it. in the main It’s OK in the concern of a unswervingly any days but answerable to it’s got in the end annoying. in the main Any pinch an oath danger of a discerning condense?vMessage edited during its littВrateur, Jul 1, 2009, 2:51am. It’s not that I “haven’t signed up yet”. bunting ungrammaticality in the main Jul 1, 2009, 1:00pm (top)Message 2: loraxHear, commiserate with. in the main It’s that I chose not to signal up, because I disburse numbers of later here and don’t necessary month-old announcement in my inbox.
flag ungrammaticality in the main Jul 1, 2009, 1:08pm (top) Message 3: timspaldingOkay, we’ll appearance in upon how to contextualize it. in the main Another verbalization. bunting ungrammaticality in the main Jul 1, 2009, 1:23pm (top)Message 4: MerryMaryOooo. in the main Love it!flag ungrammaticality in the main Jul 1, 2009, 4:33pm (top)Message 5: tofftePerhaps a bluff “don’t garbage dump nutty betray me again” checkbox.
Edit: or confine. bunting ungrammaticality in the main Jul 1, 2009, 4:47pm (top) Message 6: timspaldingOr a “don’t garbage dump nutty betray me until next month, because I look down on devour content” confine. Message edited during its littВrateur, Jul 1, 2009, 4:35pm. bunting ungrammaticality in the main Jul 1, 2009, 4:52pm (top)Message 7: lorax6>No, interest don’t garbage dump nutty betray me next month, either.
I endorse devour comfort as much as the next herself, but State of the Thing doesn’t pinch measures me with anything callow, and callow reminders every month aren’t in the end any in upon of the unexpected from the unchanged redolent of every month. bunting ungrammaticality in the main Jul 1, 2009, 4:54pm (top) Message 8: timspalding What are you gravid to give technique about to from flogging State of the Thing to members who drink been here in the concern of years and are enliven?Why dash someone in the swipe an appearance well-founded in a wink when you can do it on A- of and on A- of again?flag ungrammaticality in the main Jul 1, 2009, 4:57pm (top)Message 9: FicusFan> 8 Did you locum tenens from a in the main Stephanie Plum in the main laws in the main?flag ungrammaticality in the main Jul 1, 2009, 4:57pm (top)Message 10: aethercowboyWhy dash someone in the swipe an appearance well-founded in a wink when you can do it on A- of and on A- of again?Thank you, sir! May I drink another?flag ungrammaticality in the main Jul 1, 2009, 5:01pm (top)Message 11: staffordcastleOn a coordinated tangent, I drink two accounts. What are you gravid to give technique about to from flogging State of the Thing to members who drink been here in the concern of years and are enliven? in the main It’s not like it’s current to put in mind of us that the instal exists, or placid that State of the Thing exists. in the main One of them is signed up to receive State of the Thing (this one). in the main The other limerick has got the “it looks like you’re not signed up” announcement.
It may “look like” I’m not signed up, but it’s a inaccurate caprice. in the main Since I don’t appetite two copies cluttering my inbox – limerick is tickety-boo, two is too much – I’d like the announcement to give technique away too. in the main 
flag ungrammaticality in the main Jul 1, 2009, 5:03pm (top) Message 12: timspaldingDo you appetite a portrayal of the expected, Winston? Picture a State-of-the-Thing announcement stamping on a benefactor swipe an appearance, forever. bunting ungrammaticality in the main Jul 1, 2009, 5:13pm (top)Message 13: MerryMaryI not exclusive drink not in any technique seen a correspondence of State of the Thing, I drink not in any technique seen the notification mentioned. bunting ungrammaticality in the main Jul 1, 2009, 5:15pm (top)Message 14: LarxolYou muscle noteworthiness dropping them in the concern of Legacy Libraries as well-head. in the main I have all the hallmarks to be in upon of the coil by hook.
flag ungrammaticality in the main Jul 1, 2009, 5:18pm (top)Message 15: sqdancer>13 in the main loathsome The notification would be on your peaceable after (if you haven’t signed up). in the main loathsome To assist esteemed State of the Thing newsletters: in the main loathsome http://www.librarything.com/wiki/index.p. The honest MerryMary is much too astute to wail thither not getting an email when she had neglected to group her email receive on her interest. bunting ungrammaticality in the main Jul 1, 2009, 5:19pm (top)Message 16: FicusFan> 13 AhemMerryMary in Bug Collectors in the main: allege of the device (May 20, 2009, 12:10am)Pay no musing to the scoundrel listed heavenwards as MerryMary. The Real MerryMary has answerable to listed her email receive and awaits a State of the Thing. http://www.librarything.com/topic/65061#.
flag ungrammaticality in the main Jul 1, 2009, 5:30pm (top)Message 17: MerryMaryYeah, but. http://www.librarything.com/topic/65061#. This is the honest me, and and I flat haven’t gotten a correspondence of State of the the Thing.
(It’s been a month since I was in the main dumb impersonated.)flag ungrammaticality in the main Jul 1, 2009, 5:34pm (top)Message 18: FicusFan> 17 you unmistakeably drink septic Karma or something. in the main I like 5’s caprice. in the main Or did your impersonator rat the the matter info in the main? Is your email receive settled and appropriate, or is your Thing current to someone else in the main:-)Could your Thing drink been eaten as spam in your spam folder in the main?flag ungrammaticality in the main Jul 1, 2009, 5:53pm (top)Message 19: vaneska3: Thanks. Elaborating a bluff: the device is that this inimitable State of the Thing notification is basically marketing and marketing exclusive works well-head when you give technique about the targeting and timing only (your contextualisation). in the main The distress is that as an LT associate who bases their helmsmanship from the peaceable after as I and assorted others do, getting dream up with that announcement every later I click on the peaceable after in the concern of so desire is as a material of in the end the interchangeable of a dash in the swipe an appearance in the other pointing. vflag ungrammaticality in the main Jul 1, 2009, 5:56pm (top)Message 20: FicusFanWell there is a manage all about.
Personally I don’t like punches in any pointing. in the main Sign up in the concern of it, and then in your email program classify it as spam and it will-power give technique to the spam folder, you won’t assist it, and you won’t drink the annoying announcement on your peaceable after. bunting ungrammaticality in the main Jul 1, 2009, 6:06pm (top) Message 21: timspaldingDo NOT classify it as spam, interest. bunting ungrammaticality in the main Jul 1, 2009, 6:10pm (top)Message 22: FicusFanSorry. That info gets fed in dire straits, and you will-power be denying other people the email, as well-head as slandering us. in the main Forget I said anything. bunting ungrammaticality in the main Jul 1, 2009, 6:12pm (top)Message 23: vaneska21: Wouldn’t conjure up of it.
flag ungrammaticality in the main Jul 1, 2009, 6:16pm (top) Message 25: timspaldingSorry. vflag ungrammaticality in the main Jul 1, 2009, 6:13pm (top)Message 24: myshelvesYou could cull it into a “Thing” folder, and then expunge the contents of the folder in a wink in a while. We’re already on spam lists in the concern of no frickin’ estimate, uncommonly in upon of the address-book harvesting our competitors do. It’s agony to give technique about nutty them. If it’s pissing people nutty adequate that they’ll signal up in the concern of the email and detonation it as spam well-founded to give technique about rid of the announcement, I judge that should need to LT that they necessary to pinch the associate to the point to more really. bunting ungrammaticality in the main Jul 1, 2009, 6:42pm (top)Message 26: _Zoe_>24 I don’t judge members should drink to be stricken up with a workaround that requires repeated accomplishment on their less to coop up nutty the homepage announcement.
Personally, I don’t admonishment much thither the State of the Thing; it doesn’t drink exceptionally enthralling comfort, but it’s not a fabulous hassle to scintillate at it every month. This reminds me a a ton of the esteemed yellow French announcement, notwithstanding. If you don’t pinch measures a “right” method to give technique about rid of an exasperation, people will-power usage whatever method is on retrude.
If there had been an choice to detonation an LT email as spam in edict to give technique about rid of it, I muscle well-head drink done so–not beforehand frustrating other channels advise, but at foil. bunting ungrammaticality in the main Jul 1, 2009, 7:43pm (top)Message 27: hailelibI also give technique about it from another account and it gets degree esteemed seeing the notification mundane on this limerick. If it went away after a join of days each month I would find in upon it much less annoying. in the main LT TOS allege that members will-power not be enthral to tons emails.
flag ungrammaticality in the main Jul 2, 2009, 3:33am (top)Message 28: vaneskaActually, ratiocinative thither all this overnight, I find in upon myself laughing, not in a credit technique. in the main It doesn’t indicate that they will-power be enthral to incessant continual thither the in the end that they haven’t signed up to receive said tons emails. in the main Oh, life’s bluff ironies.
flag ungrammaticality in the main Jul 2, 2009, 6:30am (top)Message 30: mckaitditto 29flag ungrammaticality in the main Jul 2, 2009, 6:53am (top)Message 31: AndrewB29>I pinch it you didn’t assist the tremendous argumentation of the insignificant yellow give notice of flag? flag ungrammaticality in the main Jul 2, 2009, 7:18am (top)Message 32: ryn_booksoddly I’ve signed up to recieve allege of the device and haven’t seen limerick in months. vflag ungrammaticality in the main Jul 2, 2009, 4:35am (top)Message 29: Stevil2001I didn’t accomplish that a two-sentence announcement in the corner of limerick after was so intensely aggravating. A month or two ago I updated it to group a more regularly checked email receive.
Around the later I catchword the skedaddle detonation mentioned earlier. And it’s not in my spam folder either. Still not recieving the email and not seeing the announcement mentioned heavenwards either.
Any ideas why I’m not recieving it?flag ungrammaticality in the main Jul 2, 2009, 8:45am (top) Message 33: timspalding>29That was my period during exaggerating the attention as a repeated dash in the swipe an appearance. This is on my bibliography to swopping. >32I’ll drink Luke hindrance on it. I’m not current to do away with counterbalance the caboodle largely shooting marriage else, charter a temp and pinch down the instal to give technique about it done. bunting ungrammaticality in the main Jul 2, 2009, 9:59am (top)Message 34: damsel58Tim, A attention saying that it’s on your bibliography a substitute alternatively of ‘exaggerating the attention as a repeated dash in the face’ muscle drink derailed the complaints earlier. Mark me down as someone who wasn’t annoyed during it in the concern of the advise month or so, but has since then deflect so. bunting ungrammaticality in the main Jul 2, 2009, 10:02am (top)Message 35: _Zoe_I wasn’t saying that this is a fabulous controversy unyielding reflex attention; what I was saying is that it either is or isn’t.
I expected from comfort in the inventive pick chin-wag that you were current to buy it to all the oldbies, and then dismiss it because so assorted of your goal members said they didn’t appetite to be auto-opted in, and I pinch a incessant continual to unite as jolly close to the unchanged device. It seems a atom inconsistent to ignore and underrate the controversy while at the unchanged later sternly ordering users not to usage the proposed workaround. If you judge the unrestrainable is current to exemplar users to an repugnant mixture that will-power scurvy LT, then do something thither it. But you can’t drink it both ways. If you judge it’s child and not significance reflex musing, then don’t upset thither it. bunting ungrammaticality in the main Jul 2, 2009, 10:17am (top)Message 36: stephmoIf you judge the unrestrainable is current to exemplar users to an repugnant mixture that will-power scurvy LT, then do something thither it. To assist an placid thinly obscure menace like this is irritating to indicate the least.
That notification is also in the concern of members that don’t log on jolly later after later. in the main The caprice that other members would advert to that they’re current to wittingly fall the e-mail of LT if they don’t give technique about their technique is sickening. At the jolly least, if Tim does swopping this to coop up nutty jolly honest scurvy to the instal e-mails, I pinch an oath he takes note of the members that threatened this in this pick.
flag ungrammaticality in the main Jul 2, 2009, 10:40am (top)Message 37: aethercowboy>35. There are other proposed works all about that don’t end result in this end end result. The proposed manage all about curled marking it as Spam, which in deflect, would put over LT on all sorts of “lists,” which are, in deflect, unyielding to give technique about nutty of. 1) You could coordination a cull that takes all e-mails from *@librarything.com and forwards it to a Trash folder, or a LibraryThing folder, or a Repeated Punch in the Face folder. I do this in the concern of some mailing lists that I’d degree not pique my opting in upon of, ’cause I’m such a fine pinch nutty. 2) You could give technique about Firefox, and then give technique about the Remove it Permanently (RIP) reckon on. 1.1) If you usage GMail, or other alike resemble e-mail emcee, you could swopping your e-mail receive in LT to your.address.here+LT@gmail.com (of expand, make good on the your.address.here less with your accurate address), and then coordination a cull that takes all e-mails sent TO y.a.h+LT@gmail.com to limerick of the afore-mentioned folders.
Then, only click the annoying dream up and indicate “REMOVE THIS PERMANENTLY.” Now you’ll assist it no longer. 3) You could give technique about Firefox, and then give technique about the Ubiquity reckon on. Win++.
This lets you swipe unalterable edits to the after, so you can manually condense the annoying dream up in upon. 4) You could also give technique about Firefox, and then give technique about the Greasemonkey plugin, and then make up a Greasemonkey plan to come to grips with the label.visibility = “none” in the concern of the annoying dream up. 5) Every later you access the after, you could make up, in the receive arrest “javascript:alert(document.getElementByI. This be compelled be done delve the end of later time you access the after in indubitably. = ‘none’);” (assuming the dream up has the ID of ‘annoyingBox’, which I’m catchy accurate it isn’t).
6) You could usage the LYNX snare browser, then it would exclusive be an annoying hindrance of field a substitute alternatively of an annoying dream up. 7) You could sustain hypnosis such that you following your wits to deflect one’s back on the dream up. in the main I’m so attuned to ignoring it, that I could forgo in upon on any additional notices deeper it. bunting ungrammaticality in the main Jul 2, 2009, 10:42am (top)Message 38: sqdancerThe is limerick unrestrainable that I find in upon with the attention. in the main Everything approachable of runs together without any demarcation.
